Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/1128/2011 of KOTTE SANTHI Vs KOTTE CHENNA KESVULU on 19 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3481] MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1128/2011 Between: 1.

APHC010258002011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1128/2011

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. KOTTE SANTHI, W/O.CHENNA KESAVULU, HINDU R/O.PITCHIKALAGUDIPADU. NOW R/O.SRUNGARAPURAM, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...APPELLANT AND

1. KOTTE CHENNA KESVULU, S/o.Soma Sekhar Rao, Hindu Employee R/o.Pitchikalagudipadu Village, Korisapadu Mandal, Baptla, Guntur District.

...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersallowed the CMA and set aside the order and decree dated 08.07.2011 in HMOP No.60/2005 on the file of the Senioor civil Judge, Bapatla IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 1935 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order and decree dated 08.07.2011 in HMOP No.60/2005 on the file of the Senioor civil Judge, Bapatla, peending dispsoal of thee above CMA

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. C A R SESHAGIRI RAO Counsel for the Respondent:

1. The Court made the following:

JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

As per the report of the Mediator, the matter was not settled.

2. On 18.12.2025, there was no representation.

3. Today also, there is no representation on either side.

4. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

___________________________

JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 20.04.2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1128/2011 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

Dated: 20.04.2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead