Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/675/2012 of CHILUKURI RAMA SATYANARAYANA Vs CHILUKURI VALLU SUBRAHMANYESWARI on 19 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3481] MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 675/2012 Between: 1.

APHC010553722012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 675/2012

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CHILUKURI RAMA SATYANARAYANA, TEACHER, HINDU R/O.D.NO.14-161, GANDHINAGAR COLONY, SHADNAGAR, SHADNAGAR DMC.

...APPELLANT AND

1. CHILUKURI VALLU SUBRAHMANYESWARI, W/o.Rama Satyanarayana, Hindu R/o.D.No.1-69, Kesavaram, Alamuru DMC.

...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 263 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 32 days in filing the appeal against the decree and order passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Ramachandrapuram, made in OP No.102/2006 dated 17.09.2009 IA NO: 3 OF 2010(CMAMP 3340 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

Counsel for the Appellant:

1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent:

1. P S KRISHNA PRASAD

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

The petition for divorce filed by the husband/appellant under Section 13-1(ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, was dismissed on 17.09.2009.

2. The matter pertains to the year 2012.

3. On 10.03.2026, at request of the learned counsel for the appellant, the matter was directed to be posted again for obtaining instructions.

4. Ms. Pilla Pushpa Latha, learned counsel representing Sri N. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant submits that, instructions are not being provided in spite of the efforts made. Consequently, the learned counsel for the appellant is not able to argue the matter.

5. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________

JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 20.04.2026 MSI

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 675/2012 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

Dated: 20.04.2026 MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead