Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13095/2019 of Upputuri David Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 19 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13095/2019 Between: 1. UPPUTURI DAVID, S/0. HEAVEN, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRI COOLIE,
APHC010284632019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13095/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. UPPUTURI DAVID, S/0. HEAVEN, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRI COOLIE, R/O. MULAVARIPALLI VILLAGE PC PALLY MANDALAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE
3. THE TAHSILDAR, P.C. PALLI MANDALAM, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
4. KODAVATHATIKANTI PRASAD, S/O. PEDDA RAMAIAH, AGED MAJOR R/O. GUNTUPALLI VILLAGE, PEDDA CHARLAPALLI MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official respondents in not restrain the 4th respondent who were illegally trespassed into the government land which is in enjoyment of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents in Sy No. 704/2 situated at Mulavaripalli Village, PC Pally Mandalam, Prakasam District without considering the representations dated 27.08.2018 and 19.08.2019 of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and vilative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of
Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to resist the 4 respondent not to trespass into the government land which is in enjoyment of the petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the official respondents, 2 and 3 to restrain the 4th respondent by trespassing in to the government land which is in enjoyment of the petitioner to an extent of Ac.1.50 cents in Sy No. 704/2 situated at Mulavaripalli Village, PC Pally Mandalam, Prakasam District by considering the representations dated 27.08.2018 and 19.08.2019 of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B S S PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. Y NAGI REDDY
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.L.Uma Shankar, learned counsel, representing, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 20.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13095/2019
Date: 20.04.2026 rsd