Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/4902/2015 of T.Koteswara Rao, Vs The Regional P.F.Commissioner, on 19 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 4902/2015 Between: 1. T.KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O. BHASKARA RAO AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, OCC :
APHC010404332015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 4902/2015
Between:
1. T.KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O. BHASKARA RAO AGED ABOUT 75
YEARS, OCC : AGRICULTURAL COOLI R/O. INKOLL U, PRAKASAM
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE REGIONAL P F COMMISSIONER, SUB REGIONAL OFFICER, VUDA LAYOUT, MARRIPALEM, NAD POST, VISAKHAPATNAM -
530009.
2. T JEEVITHA, W/O. LATE. RAJESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC : TEACHER R/O. INKOLLU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more so, a writ in the nature of Mandamus by decalring the action of the 1st respondent in refusing to admit the petitioner for family pension for EPF Account No.GR/VSP/2760/13968 as arbitrary illegal, inequitable unjust and consequentiay to direct the 1st respondent to pay the famiy pension to the petitioner and may pass.
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider for payment of family pension to the petitioner as a nominee and as per the award passed by the Lokadalat, Ongole for EPF Account No.GR/VSP/2760/ 13968 during the pendency cf the above writ petition and may pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)
2. B NARASIMHA SARMA
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION No.4902 of 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER: -
On 09.09.2025, 25.11.2025, 16.12.2025, 19.01.2026, 02.02.2026, 16.02.2026, 02.03.2026, 18.03.2026 and 06.04.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner.
2. To give a last chance, it is posted today, under the caption “for dismissal”. Today also, there is no representation.
3. It appears that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
5. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date: 20.04.2026 SA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO.4902 of 2015
Dt.20.04.2026 SA