Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/3136/2026 of BHARTI @ BHARATI Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 19 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3136/2026 Between: 1. BHARTI @ BHARATI, W/O. ANIL AGE 40 YEARS HOUSE
APHC010204032026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. BHARTI @ BHARATI, W/O. ANIL AGE 40 YEARS HOUSE NO. 322, BLOCK-C GALI NO.4 NITHARI SULTHANPURI NORTH WEST DELHI
DELHI
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT
AMARAVATI.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to modify the condition ordered against the Petitioner/Accused No.7 is to be enlarged on bail on his/him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vijayawada, and out of the two sureties, one must be a local resident imposed while granting bail on 26.3.2026 passed in CrI.M.P No. 219
of 2026 on the file of the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayawada in Crime No. 584 of 2025 of Bhavanipuram Police Station NTR
Commissionerate NTR district and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the condition ordered against the Petitioner/ Accused No.7 is to be enlarged on bail on his/him executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawada, and out of the two sureties, one must be a local resident imposed while granting bail on 26.3.2026 passed in CrI.M.P No. 219 of 2026 on the file of the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge Vijayawada and the petitioner did not obtained the certified copies of the order in CrI.M.P No. 219 of 2026
and hence filed the photocopy of the same and the same may be dispensed with.
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. MARELLA RADHA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition has been filed by the petitioner/Accused No.7, seeking to modify the condition viz., ‘the petitioner/Accused No.7 to be enlarged on bail on his/him executing a bond of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate Vijayawada, and out of the two sureties, one must be a local resident’ imposed against the petitioner while granting bail on 26.03.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.219 of 2026 by the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, in Crime No.584 of 2025 of Bhavanipuram Police Station, NTR Commissionerate.
2. Heard Ms. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State.
3. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that he case pertains to child trafficking, and that the petitioner may the present petition before the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, seeking relaxation of the condition, as the individual continues to languish in jail despite the grant of bail.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioner to move such application before the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada.
5. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, seeking relaxation of condition. On filing such application, learned Judge is directed to dispose of the same, according to law, as expeditiously as possible.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 20.04.2026. UPS
Dt.20.04.2026
UPS