Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4212/2025 of T. LAKSHMANA RAO Vs K. PRAMOD KUMA REDDY on 16 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4212/2025 Between: 1. T. LAKSHMANA RAO, S/O T. APPARAO NAIDU AGED 71 YEARS, OCC
APHC010709322025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4212/2025
Between:
1. T. LAKSHMANA RAO, S/O T. APPARAO NAIDU AGED 71 YEARS, OCC MANAGER(RETIRED), ANDHRA PRADESH GRAMEENAVIKAS
BANK, R/O PLOT NO.4, SBI STAFF COLONY, BONDILIPURAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. K PRAMOD KUMA REDDY, ANDHRA PRADESH GRAMEENA BANK
CHAIRMAN, HEAD OFFICE AT D.NO. 5-37-234, 4TH FLOOR, RAGHU
MANSION, 4/1, BRODIPET, GUNTUR CITY AND DISTRICT
2. SHRI
B
SURYAKUMAR
ARUNKUMAR,
ANDHRA
PRADESH
GRAMEENA BANK BOARD OF DIRECTOR, HEAD OFFICE AT D.NO.
5-37-234, 4TH FLOOR, RAGHU MANSION, 4/1, BRODIPET, GUNTUR
CITY AND DISTRICT
3. SHRI C V N BHASKARA RAO, ANDHRA PRADESH GRAMEENA
BANK BOARD OF DIRECTOR, HEAD OFFICE AT D.NO. 5-37-234, 4TH FLOOR, RAGHU MANSION, 4/1, BRODIPET, GUNTUR CITY AND
DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased topleased to punish the Respondents / Contemnors herein for their willful violation and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 10.07.2025 in W.P.No.9114/2021 passed by this Honble Court, under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SODUM ANVESHA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. V UMA DEVI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
Heard Ms. N.Sahithi Aparna, learned counsel representing Ms. Sodum Anvesha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. V.Uma Devi, learned counsel for the 1st respondent.
2. It is stated that against the order passed in W.P.No.9114 of 2021, the respondents have filed a writ appeal in W.A.No.108 of 2026. The said writ appeal was disposed of on 16.03.2026, granting liberty to the respondents herein to pass a fresh order in accordance with law and in compliance with the order dated 31.08.2020. In view of the same, respondents would submit that the fresh orders would be passed in terms of W.A.No.108 of 2026. As the order passed in the writ petition has merged with the order passed in the writ appeal, it cannot be said that there is any willful disobedience of the order passed in the writ petition.
3. Having regard to the same, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 17.04.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:4212 of 2025
Dated: 17.04.2026
ANI