Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/312/2025 of MUDDADA RAMU Vs SRI KODALI JOHN SUDHAKAR on 16 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

312 OF 2025 NJS,J. APHC010044192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 312/2025 Between: 1. MUDDADA RAMU, S/O

NJS,J.

APHC010044192025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 312/2025

Between:

1. MUDDADA RAMU, S/O SREERAMULU (LATE), AGE 45 YEARS, OCC

TYPIST,

O/O

EXECUTIVE

ENGINEER,

R

AND

B

DIVISION,

SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI KODALI JOHN SUDHAKAR, Superintending Engineer, (R and B), R

and B Circle Office, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District.

...CONTEMNOR

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SANTHAPUR SATYANARAYANA RAO

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO

The Court made the following:

NJS,J.

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 312/2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R:

1. This Contempt Case is filed for willful violation of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.18235 of 2021 on 12.09.2024, wherein this Court passed the following order:

“… setting aside the impugned Proceedings in Rc.No.93/2021-A3, dated 27.01.2021 of the 1st respondent, directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in the matter of regularization of the services of the petitioner by declaring his probation in the cadre of Typist from the date of joining into duty in accordance with due procedure with all consequential benefits, within three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order".

2. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Ethakota Venkat Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the order dated 12.09.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.No.18235 of 2021 has been complied-with by the respondents. Therefore, requested this Court to close the contempt case.

3. Recording the above submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:17.04.2026 KS

NJS,J.

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 312 /2025

DATED 17.04.2026

KS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead