Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/837/2026 of MUTYALA RAJA SEKHARA REDDY Vs THAMMISETTY RAGHUVEER on 16 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 837/2026 Between: 1. MUTYALA RAJA SEKHARA REDDY, S/O. NAGABHUSHANA

APHC010137872026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 837/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. MUTYALA RAJA SEKHARA REDDY, S/O. NAGABHUSHANA REDDY, AGED AOBUT 48 YEARS, D.NO. 15-18-60,1ST LANE, MARUTHI NAGAR, NEAR MANI HOTEL CENTRE, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THAMMISETTY RAGHUVEER, S/O. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D.NO. 25-4-84, A. AGRAHARAM, GUNTUR CITY.

2. MURUKONDA KOTESWAR RAO, S/O. TIRUPATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, C/O. SRI SALLADH, DOOR NO. 12-8-423, FLORA THE MANSON, MALLEGUDA, NEAR ST. MARK CHURCH, SECUNDERABAD -500 017.

3. JANGA NAGENDRAMMMA DIED, REP. BY RESPONDENTS NO. 10 AND 11.

4. MOHAMMAD, S/O. ABDUL WAHAB, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. NEAR ICE FACTORY, NIJAMPATNAM POST AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

5. SANIKOMMA VENKATA REDDY, S/O. CHINA SUBBA REDDY, AGED AOUT

YEARS, D.NO. 13-4-49, 4RT LANE, GUNTURIVARITHODA, GUNTUR CITY.

RRR,J C.R.P.No.837 of 2026

6. SANIKOMMU SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O. CHINA SUBBA REDDY, AGED AOUT

YEARS, D.NO. 13-4-49, 4RT LANE, GUNTURIVARITHOTA, GUNTUR CITY.

7. YERUVA VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/O. LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS. D.NO. 13-8-20, LANE, GUNTURIVARITHOTA, GUNTUR CITY.

8. GUTHA RAMA KRISHNA MOHAN RAO, , S/O. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D.NO. 4-21-42/LA, 4TH LANE, CHAITANYAPURI, KORITEPADU, GUNTUR CITY.

9. DEVIREDDY RAMACHANDRA REDDY, S/O. VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, D.NO. 15-6-121, 3RD LANE, THAMMA RANGA REDDY NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR CITY.

10. JANGA SANKARA REDDY, S/O. USI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, D.NO. 15-18-78/A, 1ST LANE, MARUTI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

11. JANGA PRABHAKAR REDDY, S/O. USI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, D.NO. 15-18-78/A, 1ST LANE, MARUTI NAGAR, OLD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to DIRECT the lst Additional District Judge, Guntur to dispose off the suit in O.S.No. 255 of 2015 expeditiously to meet ends of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. RRR,J C.R.P.No.837 of 2026

The Court made the following Order:

The petitioner herein, had filed O.S.No.255 of 2015, before the learned I Additional District Judge, Guntur, seeking specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 05.03.2011. The suit appears to have been dismissed against the 2nd defendant and an application has been filed by the petitioner for restoration of the suit against the 2nd defendant.

2. The petitioner has now approached this Court with the complaint that neither the said application for restoration of the suit against the 2nd defendant nor the suit itself is being disposed of, despite the fact that the suit has been pending for more than ten years.

3. In view of the fact that the pendency of the suit for more than ten years would be affecting the rights of the petitioner, it would be appropriate to dispose of the revision petition with a direction to the trial Court to dispose of O.S.No.255 of 2015 and the interlocutory applications filed in the said suit without a period of six (06) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J

Date:17.04.2026 JLV

RRR,J

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO

CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.837 of 2026

17.04.2026

JLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead