Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4439/2022 of Kodati Ramya Krishna Vs M. Abhishikth Kishore, on 16 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4439/2022 Between: 1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA, W/O SOLOMON RAJU, AGED 32
APHC010560302022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4439/2022
Between:
1. KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA, W/O SOLOMON RAJU, AGED 32
YEARS, OCC- ADVOCATE, R/O FLAT NO- 102, MOVVA
MANSION, UNDAVALLI, GUNTUR. PERMANENT R/O HNO- 8-20-26, ULLITHOTA
VEEDHI,
MADHIREDDYVARI
SANDHU, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. M
ABHISHIKTH
KISHORE,
OCC-
COMMISSIONER,
RAJAHMUNDRY
MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
2. P PRASANTHI, OCC-DISTRICT COLLECTOR CUM IN- CHARGE COMMISSIONER, RAJAHMUNDRY MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION,
RAJAHMUNDRY,
EAST
GODAVARI
DISTRICT. R 2 IS IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER
DATED 16.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO-4439 OF
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file
herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for willfully and deliberately violating the orders of this Hontle Court in WP No- 26361 of 2021 dated 12.11.2021 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to implead the proposed respondent No: 2 as respondent No: 2 to the above contempt case No: 4439 of 2022 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVAS AMBATI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
2. MANOHAR REDDY MALLASANI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 12.11.2021, passed by this Court in W.P.No.26361 of 2021.
2. After receipt of the notice, the respondents have filed the reply. According to the said reply, the respondents have implemented the orders passed by this Court by removing the godowns in residential area.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, has submitted that the respondents have partially removed and not fully removed.
4. Considering the submissions made by both parties, the contempt case is closed. Since the contempt case is fled against the interim order and the main writ petition is pending, if there is any grievance, the petitioner may agitate the same in the main writ petition.
5. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:17.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:4439 of 2022
Dated:17.04.2026
GK