Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/592/2026 of NUNE HARI BABU Vs SRI K RAMA CHANDRA MOHAN on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 592/2026 Between: 1. NUNE HARI BABU, S/O.RAMA KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010069722026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 592/2026
Between:
1. NUNE HARI BABU, S/O.RAMA KOTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION,
R/0.D.N0.143-3A,
POLERAMMA
TEMPLE
CENTRE,
VARAGANI
VILLAGE,
PEDANANDIPADU
MANDAL,
GUNTUR DISTRICT,522235.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI K RAMA CHANDRA MOHAN, The Commissioner, Endowment Department, A.P., Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District ,521225.
...CONTEMNOR
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein who is intentionally violating the order, dated 02-12-2025 passed in W.P.No.4900 of 2025 by the Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kiranmayee Mandava Garu and punish the respondent for committing contempt of court for disobeying the order, dated 02-12-2025
made in W.P.No.4900 of 2025 by holding him personally responsible for the costs and consequences thereof as per Article 215 of the Constitution of India, besides Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act f1971 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D.RAMASWAMY REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The instant contempt case is filed against the respondent for disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.4900 of 2025 dated 02.12.2025.
2. When the matter has been taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing for the respondent has placed before the Court a copy of the proceedings dated 10.04.2026, disposing of the representation filed by the petitioner, pursuant to the directions of this Court in W.P.No.4900 of 2025 dated 02.12.2025, an opportunity of hearing was also provided to the petitioner and the representation was disposed of.
3. Having regard to the same, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated:16.04.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:592 of 2026
Dated: 16.04.2026
ANI