Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/108/2024 of PAUSPULA MAHESH Vs M/S M V V BUILDERS (DEVELOPERS) on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 108/2024 Between: 1. PAUSPULA MAHESH, S/O. LATE KRISHNAYYA, AGED 46
APHC010018842024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3332]
THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 108/2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PAUSPULA MAHESH, S/O. LATE KRISHNAYYA, AGED 46 YEARS, R.D.NO.3-225/1, SARADA NAGAR,
LINE, BALIGHATTAM, NARSIPATNANN, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. M/S M V V BUILDERS DEVELOPERS, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SRI. M.V.V. SATYANARAYANA, S/O. LATE RAGHUNAIKULU, HAVING OFFICE AT MIG-26, D.NO.4-62-1, PLOT NO.21, LAWSONS BAY COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM
2. VALLANKI SRINIVAS RAO, S/O. LATE VELLANKI RANGA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. MOGALIRAJAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA,
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the Order, dt.13.10.2023 in
I.A.No.764/2022 in O.S.No.242/2022on the file of Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to grant temporary injunction restraining the Respondents from creating any third party interest or making developments in the suit schedule property until disposal of this Civil Revision Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following order:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 13.10.2023 passed in I.A.No.764 of 2022 in O.S.No.242 of 2022 by the learned I Addl Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.
2. No representation for the petitioner.
3. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.242 of 2022 was dismissed as not pressed on 12.11.2025.
4. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous .
5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS