Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2806/2026 of Ganta Vijay Kumar Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2806/2026 Between: GANTA VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. PRABHUDAS, AGED ABOUT 25
APHC010188782026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2806/2026
Between:
GANTA VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. PRABHUDAS, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC.
COOLIE, R/O. H.NO. 29-27-48/476A, 4 LINE, BHANUPRASAD COLONY, LALPURAM ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AMARAVATI.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. MD SALEEM
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant petition under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner / Accused No.5, in connection with Crime No.1229 of 2022 on the file of Nallapadu Police Station, Guntur registered for the offence under Section 307 read with 34 IPC.
2. Heard Sri Md.Saleem, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Respondent / State.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner is innocent of the alleged offence. Learned counsel would further submit that the allegations made in the report do not disclose any specific overt acts against the Petitioner and he was falsely implicated. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the Petitioner. Learned counsel would further submit that the other Accused were granted regular bail in this case. Hence, prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.
4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the petition and would submit that there are specific allegations against the Petitioner with regard to the commission of the alleged offence. It is further submitted that no case is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner at this stage.
5. Considering the nature of the allegations and the specific accusations made against the Petitioner, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case to exercise discretion in favour of the Petitioner at this stage.
6. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. The Petitioner is at liberty to surrender before the concerned Court within one week from this day and move regular bail application. On filing such application, the learned Judge may pass appropriate order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.04.2026 Dinesh
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.2806 of 2026
DATE:16.04.2026
Dinesh