Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/3624/2025 of D VIJAYA KUMARI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 15 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 3624/2025 Between: 1. D VIJAYA KUMARI, SRI SAI RAM DWCRA GROUP, W/O MUDDU SWAMY NAIDU, 9 ANNAMAYYA DT. A.P. 1. THE STATE OF

APHC010066722025

IN TH

THURSDA

TWO

THE HONOURA

W

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. D VIJAYA KUMAR SWAMY NAIDU, ANNAMAYYA DT. A

1. THE STATE OF SECRETARY, CO SECRETARIAT, VE

2. THE DISTRICT ANNAMAYYA DIST

3. THE REVENUE DI DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR C DISTRICT.

5. THE MANDAL PA PRAJA PARISHAD,

6. THE PILERU GRA PILERU, ANNAMA Petition under Articl circumstances stated in

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 3624/2025 RI, SRI SAI RAM DWCRA GROUP, 9-383/3, RAJIV NAGAR COL A.P. AND ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT NSUMER AFFAIRS AND CIVIL D ELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR COLLECTOR CIVIL SUPPLIES, TRICT. IVISIONAL OFFICER, RAYACHOTI, CIVIL SUPPLIES, PILERU MANDAL, ARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFIC , PILERU, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. AM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS AYYA DISTRICT ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High DESH

L LAPATI W/O MUDDU LONY, PILER, ...PETITIONER TS PRINCIPAL DEPARTMENT, R DISTRICT. RAYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA , ANNAMAYYA CER, MANDAL SECRETARY. SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 respondent in not allowing the petitioner to operate Fair Price Shop NO.43PLR2004 of Pileru village, Pileru Mandal, Annamayya District without notice and chance for explanation and allowing the third parties to operate the Fair Price Shop No.43PLR2004 without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 and consequently direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to restore and continue the petitioner as fair price shop dealer in respect of Fair Price Shop No.43PLR2004 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents herein to restore and continue the petitioner as fair price shop dealer in respect of Fair Price Shop NO.43PLR2004 and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as Respondent No.7 in the above said Writ and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

The Court made the following order:

Questioning the action of respondent No.3 in not allowing the petitioner to operate Fair Price shop No.43PLR2004 of Pileru Village, Pileru Mandal, Annamayya District without issuing notice and in allowing the third parties to operate the said Fair Price shop without following the due process of law, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

2. Sri Vineeth Appasani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies Department, submits that the respondent authorities have now suspended the petitioner’s authorization and that the petitioner has to challenge the said order separately. Therefore, the present Writ Petition has become infrucutuous.

3. Sri D.Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to challenge the suspension proceedings.

4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the suspension order before the appropriate forum, if law permits. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 16.04.2026 MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 3624 of 2025 Date: 16.04.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead