CRP/3130/2023 of ANNAM NAGESWARA RAO Vs MAMIDI ESWARAMMA on 15 April 2026

1. ANNAM NAGESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. L.I.G-24, SEETOR-III, NEAR 3RD BUS STOP, RATNAGIRI COLONY, POTHINAMALLAYYAPALEM HOUSING BOARD COLONY, POTHINAMALLAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...PETITIONER AND

1. MAMIDI ESWARAMMA, DIED

2. SMT MAMIDI KANKANALA HIMA, W/O KANKANALA POOMA CHANDRA PRABHAKAR, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-23, C/O R.T.C. LAKSHMI, SIMHADRI NAGAR, SIMHACHALAM ROAD, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-27

3. MAMIDI NARENDRA KUMAR, S/O LATE VENKATA RAMANA, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-23, C/O R.T.C. LAKSHMI, SIMHADRI NAGAR,

SIMHACHALAM ROAD, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-27

4. MAMIDI SANTOSH SAGAR, , S/O LATE VENKATA RAMANA, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.6-23, C/O R.T.C. LAKSHMI, SIMHADRI NAGAR, SIMHACHALAM ROAD, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM-27

5. SMT ANNAM NAGA MALLESHWARI, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT ,44 YEARS, R/O. L.I.G-24, SECTOR-ILL, NEAR 3RD BUS STOP, RATNAGIRI COLONY, POTHINAMALLAYYAPALEM

HOUSING BOARD COLONY,

POTHINAMALLAYYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to prefer this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition aggrieved by the Order dated.25.07.2023 passed in E.P No. 30 of 2017 in O.S.No.844 of 2009 on the file of Court of VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Order dated. 25.07.2023 passed in E.P No. 30 of 2017 in O.S.No.844 of 2009 on the file of Court of VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time to comply the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court vide order dt.02.01.2024 passed in IA. No. 1 of 2023 in C.R.P. No.3130 of2023 during the pendency of the above Civil Revision Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. The Court made the following order:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order 25.07.2023 passed in E.P.No.30 of 2017 in O.S.No.844/2009 by the learned VII Addl Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.

2. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the E.P.No.30 of 2017 in O.S.No.844/2009 was dismissed for default on 17.04.2025.

3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an E.P. in the said suit becomes infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate application as and when the E.P. is restored. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS