AS/180/2005 of B. Sreenivasa Sreekrishna, Vs Sri Durgamalleswara Education Society, on 15 April 2026

1. B. SREENIVASA BUSINESS R/O D SREENAGAR COLO

1. SRI DURGAMALLE PRESIDENT C/O VIJAYAWADA.

2. THE STATE ELEC COOP. BUILDGS COLONY, VIJAYAW ENGINEER (OPERA

3. B SREENIVASA A PROPETIES, MOGA appeal against the d the file of Court of the III A IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TIL RABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 180/2005 SREEKRISHNA,, S/O SRI B.S. .NO. 102, GEETANJALI APRT., PL ONY, HYDERABAD. AND ESWARA EDUCATION SOCIETY, O SATAVAHANA COLLEGE, GA CTRICITY BOARD OPERATION CI SOCIETY LTD., G.NO. 2343 O WADA, C/O OFFICE OF THE SUPE ATION), APSEB, BANDAR ROAD, APPA RAO, S/O LATE SIVARAMA ALRAJAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...RES decree & judgment in OS No. 253/98, Addl. Dist. Judge, Vijayawada, Krishn P 596 OF 2005 on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma DESH

L LHARI MALLI APPA RAO, LOT NO. 108, ...APPELLANT REP BY ITS ANDHINAGAR, RCLE, STAFF OF SRINAGAR ERINTENDING KRISHNAIAH, SPONDENT(S): , dt. 20.11.04 on a Dist. mstances stated ay be pleased to suspend the judgement and decree dt. 20.11.04 passed in OS NO. 253/98 on the file of the III Addl. Dist. Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna Dist., pending disposal of the appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2005(ASMP 809 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant ad-interim injunction restraining respondents 1 and 2 from making any constructions or from altering the nature of the A& B of Plaint Schedule Property. Counsel for the Appellant: 1.. Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. LALAM SYAMANTHA

2. RAJA REDDY KONETI

The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

This appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff, being aggrieved from the judgment and decree dated 20.11.2004 passed in O.S.No.253 of 1998 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Vijayawada.

2. On 16.02.2026, the following order was passed:

“Notice was sent to the appellant on account of the elevation of the appellant’s counsel to the Bench.

2. As per the office report dated 09.02.2026, the position is as under: “Sole Appellant- Notice sent correct address on 17/04/2025 but tappal not yet returned till today and also consignment track report not available as per Postal Department.”

3. Awaiting service of notice.

4. List after four weeks.

5. Office to submit fresh service report.”

3. As per the office report dated 10.04.2026, notice has been received back unserved with the endorsement ‘no such person in the address’. Registered notice was sent to the correct address of the appellant, as given in the memo filed by the respondent.

4. The matter pertains to the year 2005 shown under the caption ‘old matters’.

5. In view of the aforesaid office report, there is deemed service on the appellant.

6. As none appears for the appellant, as also in view of the office report, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.

No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 16.04.2026 MDP