Andhra Pradesh High Court
AS/622/2008 of The Board of Trustees of Port Trust of Visakhapatnam A body Vs M/s. Shalimar Works (1980) Ltd. on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE APPEAL SUIT NO: 622/2008 Between: 1. THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PORT TRUST OF VISAKHAPATNAM A BODY, CORPOAATE CREATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE MAJOR PORT TRU
APHC010108912008
IN TH
THURSDA
TWO
THE HONOUR
THE HONOUR
A
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE BOARD OF TR A BODY, CORPOA THE MAJOR POR SECRETARY & VISAKHAPATNAM.
1. M/S SHALIMAR W registered office rep Garden Reach, Kolk
IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup condone the delay of 81 and pass Counsel for the Appella
1. P SRI RAM E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TIL RABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 622/2008 RUSTEES OF PORT TRUST OF VISA AATE CREATED UNDER THE PR RT TRU REP. BY SRI M. RAG ALTERNATE ATTORNEY H
AND WORKS 1980 LTD, S/o. Not Know
p. by its Managing Director Sri. A.K kota-700023 ...R P 1450 OF 2008 on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma 5 days in representing the ASSR. No ant: DESH
L LHARI MALLI AKHAPATNAM OVISIONS OF GIYA DEPUTY HINDU, R/O. ...APPELLANT wn, having its .Chatterji, at 4, RESPONDENT mstances stated ay be pleased to
o. 4988 of 2006
RNT,J & BM,J A.S.No.622 of 2008
Counsel for the Respondent:
1. K SRINIVASA RAO
RNT,J & BM,J A.S.No.622 of 2008
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant/plaintiff, being aggrieved from the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2005 passed in O.S.No.49 of 2002 on the file of the VIII Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Visakhapatnam.
2. Memo of proof of service filed, pursuant to the previous order, to take steps for service on the respondent. But, it appears that they have not taken any steps. Today, when the case is called, none appeared for the appellant.
3. The matter pertains to the year 2008 shown under the caption ‘old matters’.
4. In view of the above, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 16.04.2026 MDP