Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1673/2023 of Cheepulla Seetharam Vs Chepulla Garagamma on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1673/2023 Between: 1. CHEEPULLA SEETHARAM, S/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 50
APHC010323022023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3332]
THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1673/2023
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. CHEEPULLA SEETHARAM, S/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 50 YEARS, D.NO.10-63, GANGADAPALEM VILLAGE , K.NAGARAPALEM PANCHAYAT, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. CHEPULLA GARAGAMMA, W/O PENTAYYUA ), AGED 72 YEARS, R/AT. DNO. 10-63, GANGADAPALEM-VILLAGE, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, K. NAGARAPALEMPANCHAYAT, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.,
2. CHEPULLA KANAKARAJU, S/O PENTAYYA (LATE), AGED 38 YEARS, R/AT. D. NO. 10-63, GANGADAPALEM VILLAGE, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, K. NAGARAPALEM PANCHAYAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.,
3. CHEPULLA BALAVATHI BALA, D/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 40 YEARS, R/AT. D. NO. 10-63, GANGADAPALEM VILLAGE, BHIMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, K. NAGARAPALEM PANCHAYAL. VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.
4. CHEPULLA TATARAO, S/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/AT. D. NO.28-16-1/3, SURYABAGH, @NEELAM VEPACHETTU
5. CHEPULLA PADA KANAKA, S/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/AT. D. NO.28-16-1/3, SURYABAGH, @NEELAM VEPACHETTU
VISAKHAPATNAM
6. CHEPULLA CHINNA KANAKA, S/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 56 YEARS, R/AT. D. NO.28-16-1/3, SURYABAGH, @NEELAM VEPACHETTU VISAKHAPATNAM
7. CHEPULLA KANNARAO KANNAIAH, S/O LATE PENTAYYA, AGED 54 YEARS, R/AT. D. NO.28-16-1/3, SURYABAGH, @NEELAM VEPACHETTU VISAKHAPATNAM
8. CHEPULLA RAMAKRISHNA, S/O LATE PENTAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O 10-63, GANGADAPALEM VILLAGE, K.NAGARAPALEM, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
9. CHEPULLA YELAMMA, D/O LATE PENTAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O 10-63, GANGADAPALEM VILLAGE, K.NAGARAPALEM, BHEEMUNIPATNAM MANDAL,
DISTRICT (RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO 9 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES IN THIS CRP)
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to the suit in OS NO.147 of 2023 on the file of the second additional senior civil judge, Visakhapatnam by set aside the docket Order dt.21-04-2023 in IA NO. 545/2023 by allowing the CRP as prayed for and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings relating to OS No. 147/ 2023 on the file of 2nd additional senior civil judge Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the main CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following order:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the legality and correctness of the order dated 21.04.2023 passed in I.A.No.545 of 2023 in O.S.No.147 of 2023 by the learned Special Judge of II Addl Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam.
2. No representation for the petitioner.
3. The case status information placed on record by the Registry shows that the suit in O.S.No.147 of 2023 was withdrawn on 26.11.2024.
4. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition filed questioning the orders passed in an I.A. in the said suit becomes infructuous .
5. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI,J BRS