Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/448/2011 of Yandru Sridhar Vs Yandru Vennela on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 448/2011 Between: 1. YANDRU SRIDHAR, S/O. VENKATAPATHI CULTIVATION, R/O. RANGAMPET VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
APHC010511752011
IN TH
THURSDA
TWO
THE HONOUR
THE HONOUR
CIVIL MISC
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. YANDRU SRIDHA RANGAMPET VILLA
1. YANDRU VENNELA Yendruvari Street, District. Appeal Under Sectio IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAM Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup condone the delay of 43803/2009 IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAM Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in sup expedite the hearing of th an early date and pass
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TIL RABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAM CELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 448/201 AR, S/O. VENKATAPATHI CULTIV AGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVA AND A, W/o. Yandru Sridhar Housewife R/o G. Medapadu, Samalkot Mandal, ...R on_____against orders MP 371 OF 2011 on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma 438 days in representing the abo MP 658 OF 2012 on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court ma he Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 44 DESH
L LHARI MALLI
VATION, R/O. ARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT
o. D.No. 5-124, East Godavari RESPONDENT mstances stated ay be pleased to ve CMASR.No. mstances stated ay be pleased to 48/2011 by fixing
RNT,J & BM,J C.M.A.No.448 of 2011
IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1351 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to serve the appeal summons to the respondent by way of substituted service of paper publication Counsel for the Appellant:
1. SRICHARAN TELAPROLU Counsel for the Respondent:
1. RNT,J & BM,J C.M.A.No.448 of 2011
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
This appeal has been filed by the appellant/husband, being aggrieved from the judgment and decree dated 15.10.2009 passed in O.P.No.84 of 2008 on the file of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.
2. On 17.02.2026, the following order was passed:
“The husband is the appellant. His petition seeking divorce under Section 13(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, was dismissed.
2. Sri Sricharan Telaprolu, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, prays for time to obtain latest instructions, as the matter has been listed after long.
3. List after four weeks.”
3. Today, when the case is called, none appeared for the appellant.
4. The matter pertains to the year 2011 shown under the caption ‘old matters’.
5. In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 16.04.2026 MDP