Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9772/2026 of PAJJURU RAMA KRISHNA Vs THE STATE OF AP on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 9772/2026 Between: 1. PAJJURU RAMA KRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, D.NO.3- 197/C. MAIN ROAD,
APHC010177642026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 9772/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PAJJURU RAMA KRISHNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, D.NO.3- 197/C. MAIN ROAD, BEHIND LIBRARY, G.KONDURU, G.KONDURU, KRISHNA, AP.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY- TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238
2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, BUS BHAWAN, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU BUS STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.520001
3. THE DISTRICT PUBLIC TRAFFIC MANAGER, DPTO / REGIONAL MANAGER, APSRTC, NTR DISTRICT VIJAYAWADA 520001
4. THE DEPORT MANAGER, AUTONAGAR DEPOT, APSRTC,VIJAYAWADA.520001
5. THE DEPOT MANAGER/ JSO, APSRTC, VIDHYADHARAPURAM ,NTR DISTRICT. 520001
...RESPONDENT(S):
The Court made the following ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not disposing of the representation/review dated 05.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.
3. The contention of the petitioner is that he was removed from the service of the Corporation by the 5th respondent vide proceedings dated 10.03.2025. Aggrieved by the said removal, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the 3rd respondent. It is submitted that the said appeal was allowed, setting aside the termination order; however, the said order was not communicated or served upon the petitioner. It is further submitted that, in the absence of communication of the appellate order, the petitioner submitted a representation/review to the 2nd respondent on 05.03.2026, requesting permission to join duty. Despite submission of the said representation/review, the 2nd respondent has not taken any action. Hence, the present writ petition.
4. Considering the submissions made, and without going into the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation/review dated 05.03.2026 submitted by the petitioner and to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with the applicable rules and on the basis of the available record, within a period of two (02) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D RAMESH 16.04.2026
klk
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 9772/2026
16.04.2026 klk