Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/810/2025 of Mylapalli Ramulu, Vs Swapnil Dinakar Pundkar, on 15 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2025 Between: 1. MYLAPALLI RAMULU,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGE 75 YEARS, 2. MYLAPALLI YARRAYYA,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA @ RAMUDU, AGE 55
APHC010148532025
IN TH
THURSDA
TWO
THE HONOURA
CO
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MYLAPALLI RAMU
2. MYLAPALLI YARR RAMUDU, AGE 55
3. MYLAPALLI RAMU AGE 51 YEARS,
4. MYLAPALLI APPA AGE 45 YEARS, RANASTHALAM MA
1. SWAPNIL DINAKA SRIKAKULAM, SRI
2. K LAKSHMANA RA ACQUISITION), NU GOVT, OF INDIA ENERGY, KOWADA SRIKAKULAM DIST
3. CH RANGAIAH, SRIKAKULAM, SRI
4. N PRASADA RAO SRIKAKULAM DIST E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL ONTEMPT CASE NO: 810/2025 LU,, S/O LATE APPANNA, AGE 75 Y RAYYA,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI T YEARS, ,, S/O LATE MYLAPALLI THAMAYYA ANNA,, S/O LATE CHINNAVADU @ (ALL ARE R/O KOVVADA MATC ANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT) ...P AND AR PUNDKAR, THE DISTRICT KAKULAM DISTRICT. AO, THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLE UCLEAR POWER CORPORATION O UNDERTAKING. DEPARTMENT A, OFFICE AT OLD BUS STAND, TRICT. THE REVENUE DIVISIONA KAKULAM DISTRICT. O, THE TAHSILDAR, RANASTHAL TRICT. ...CO DESH
L LAPATI YEARS, THAMAYYA @ A @ RAMUDU, @ LAXMUDU, CHILESAM (V), PETITIONER(S) COLLECTOR, ECTOR (LAND OF INDIA LTD, OF ATOMIC SRIKAKULAM, L OFFICER, LAM MANDAL, ONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to initiate the Contempt proceedings against the respondents and punish them suitably U/s.lO to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the orders dt.30.12.2022 passed in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020 by His Lordship the Hon ble Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. MANNAM VENKATA KRISHNA RAO
2. The Court made the following order:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the respondent authorities have complied with the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020 and there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to close the Contempt Case.
3. To the said submission, Ms. M.Devi Sree, learned counsel, representing Sri V.Sudhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that she has no instructions from the petitioners.
Recording the said submissions, the Contempt Case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months from today, if the order dated 30.12.2022 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.5941 of 2020 has not complied with. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 16.04.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:810 of 2025 Dated: 16.04.2026
MP