Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2612/2026 of Narayanaswamy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 April 2026
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2612/2026 Between: 1.NARAYANASWAMY, S/O NALLAPU PEDDA PAPANNA,AGED
APHC010179532026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2612/2026
Between:
1.NARAYANASWAMY, S/O NALLAPU PEDDA PAPANNA,AGED ABOUT
66 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 1-119PEDDAKOTIA VILLAGE, TADIMARRI
MANDALSRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.
2.NALLAPU LAKSHMINARASAMMA, W/O KATEPPA, AGEDABOUT 63
YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-63, PEDDAKOTIA VILLAGEV.
3.N SIVA BHASKAR, S/O KATEPPA, AGED 36 YEARSR/O D.NO. 1-63, PEDDAKOTIA VILLAGETADIMARRI MANDAL, SRI SATHYA SAI.
4.DASARI
SIVAKANTHA,
W/O
DASARI
NARASIMHULU,AGED
YEARS,
R/O
D.NO.
1-205,
GOTIURU
VILLAGEDHARMAVARAM
MANDAL SRI SATHYA SAI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, through S.H.O., Tadimarri Police Station, Sri Satya District, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court, Amaravati
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.R SUJAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2612 /2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
(for brevity ‘the BNSS’) by the Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4 for granting of pre-arrest bail in connection with Crime No.2 of 2026 of Tadimarri Police Station, Sri Satyasai District, registered for the alleged offences punishable under Section 118(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’).
2. Heard Sri R.Sujan Kumar, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1-State.
3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 13.01.2026 at about 3.30 p.m. in front of the defacto complainant’s house at Peddakotla village, A.1 to A.4 who belongs to the same village picked up quarrel with the defacto complainant, abused him in filthy language and beat him with stone and sticks and thereby caused grievous injuries. When the wife of defacto complainant came to his rescue, the accused also beat her with sticks and stones and caused injuries. Hence, the crime.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners had lodged a complaint against the defacto complainant and others, which came to be registered as Crime No.1 of 2026 on the file of Tadimarri Police Station, and that the present case is nothing but a counter-blast to the said complaint. He would further submit that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court, and therefore, prays that the petition be allowed by imposing appropriate conditions.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the defacto complainant and his wife sustained grievous injuries and that the present case is a counter-case. She would, therefore, pray for dismissal of the petition.
6. Having considered the submissions made on either side and upon careful perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioners have failed to make out any special or exceptional case warranting grant of anticipatory bail. In such circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners at this stage.
7. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 15.04.2026 SAB
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2612 of 2026 Dt: 15.04.2026 SAB