Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2159/2023 of S Krishnamma Vs K Venkataramana Reddy on 14 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2159/2023 Between: 1. S KRISHNAMMA, W/O S SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 50YRS, OCC-
APHC010167122023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2159/2023
Between:
1. S KRISHNAMMA, W/O S SUBRAMANYAM, AGED 50YRS, OCC- LABOURER, R/O
6-8-75015A,
JOURNALIST
COLONY,
ALIAS
KANAKABHUSHANAM
LAYOUT,
TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT (ERSTWHILE CHITTOR
DISTRICT).
...PETITIONER
AND
1. K
VENKATARAMANA
REDDY,
S/O
UNKNOWN
TO
PETITIONER, AGE- UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
TIRUPATHI
DISTRICT,
AT
TIRUPATHI.
2. KANAKA NARSA REDDY, S/O UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE- UNKNOWN
TO
PETITIONER,
THE
REVENUE
DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATHI DIVISION, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
3. K VENKATA RAMANA, S/O UNKNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGE- UNKNOWN
TO
PETITIONER,
THE
MANDAL
REVENUE
OFFICER,
TIRUPATHI
URBAN
MANDAL,
TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for committing Contempt of Court by willfully disobeying /violating this Hon'ble Court order dated 11.7.2022 in W.P. No.18637 Of 2022 passed by Hon'ble JUSTICE
D. RAMESH and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K INDIRA GOLDA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NARASIMHA REDDY. G . L
2.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 11.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.18637 of 2022.
2. Learned counsel for the contemnors, on instructions submits that the respondents have considered the request of the petitioner and allotted the house site to the petitioner and hence the respondents have complied with the order dated 11.07.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.18637 of 2022.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not refuted the same.
4. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:15.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:2159 of 2023
Dated:15.04.2026
GK