Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/887/2023 of B.HAMTHULLA MUSLIM MINORITY AND WEAKER SECTIONS Vs SMT. VIJAYAKUMARI on 14 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 887/2023 Between: 1. B.HAMTHULLA MUSLIM MINORITY AND WEAKER SECTIONS,
APHC010066872023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 887/2023
Between:
1. B.HAMTHULLA
MUSLIM
MINORITY
AND
WEAKER
SECTIONS, PORUMAMILLA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, REP.
BY S.K.ABDUL KHADAR, S/O. FARID SAHEB, RESIDENT
OF PORUMAMILLA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SMT VIJAYAKUMARI, TAHSILDAR, PORUMAMILLA, YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT
2. A VENKATARAMANA, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BADVEL DIVISION, RAJAMPET, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT
3. MR VIJAYA RAMARAJU, , DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA ..
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful, deliberate and intentional violation of orders
dated 12-09-2022 in WP No. 28025/2022 of this Hon'ble Court in implementing the orders as per direction of this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. T BALASWAMI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 12.09.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.28025 of 2022.
2. Learned counsel for the contemnors submits that they have filed counter stating that the grievance of the petitioner was considered and an endorsement was issued on 12.10.2022 and the same was also served on the petitioner. It is also made clear that on 21.03.2023, the respondents have also removed more 83 un-authorised encroachers and implemented the order dated 12.09.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.28025 of 2022.
3. Considering the above, this court is of the opinion that there is no willful disobedience on the part of the respondent-contemnors.
4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:15.04.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:887 of 2023
Dated:15.04.2026
GK