Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/241/2024 of ERUKALA JAYAMMA Vs K.RAMALAKSHMI on 14 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 241/2024 Between: 1. ERUKALA JAYAMMA, W/O. RANGANNA AGED ABOUT 45
APHC010059122024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 241/2024
Between:
1. ERUKALA JAYAMMA, W/O. RANGANNA AGED ABOUT 45
YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD R/O. 21/2/28, SIVASHANKAR
NAGAR, ADONI, KUMOOL DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. K RAMALAKSHMI, W/O. K.NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 63
YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 17-837, KRANTHI NAGAR, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P.
2. K MALLIKAIJUNA, S/O. K.NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 17-837, KRANTHI NAGAR, ADONI, KUMOOL
DISTRICT, A.P.
3. H G SARASWATHI, (DIED)
4. H G KODANDAPANI, S/O. ADINARAYANA AGED ABOUT 42
YEARS
5. H G DATTATREYA, (DIED)
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the order dated 22-01-2024 passed by the
Hon’ble II Addl. District Judge, Kumool at Adoni in E.P.No. 14/2019 in O.S.No.32/2014 by allowing the present revision petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in E.P.No.14/2019 in O.S.No.32/2014 on the file of the Hon’ble II Addl. District Judge, Kurnool at Adoni and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NAMBURI SREEMANNARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
On 11.03.2026 & 30.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter has been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 15th April, 2026
RKS