Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/395/2026 of KANURU NAGESWARA RAO Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 395/2026 Between: 1. KANURU NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. JAGANADAM, AGED
APHC010163692026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. KANURU NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. JAGANADAM, AGED ABOUT 63
YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O.FLAT NO.2504, B-BLOCK, DALLFINE'S KVNM ESTATE KANURU, PENAMALURU MANDAL, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT -
520007.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI.
2. MIKKILINENI SREE RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.203, TARAKRISHNA
RESIDENCY,
4TH
LINE,
CHALASANI
NAGAR,
KANURU,
PENAMALURU
MANDAL,
VIJAYAWADA,
NTR
DISTRICT,
ERSTWHILE KRISHNA DISTRICT - 520007.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision case by setting aside the order of the lower court dated 16.03.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.40 of 2026
IN CC.No.3851 of 2024 on the file of the VII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways-Cum-VII Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings CC.No.3851 of 2024 on the file of the VII
Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways-Cum-VII Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Vijayawada, and pas Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M K RAJ KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri M.K.Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present revision with a liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned Court.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned Court.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 15.04.2026. UPS
Dt: 15.04.2026
UPS