Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22111/2025 of PADUCHURI VENKATA RANGA RAO Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 14 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 22111/2025 Between: 1. PADUCHURI VENKATA RANGA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA, AGED
APHC010426532025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 22111/2025
Between:
1. PADUCHURI VENKATA RANGA RAO, S/O. NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. SENIOR ASSISTANT, R/O. D.N0.3-6-15A, OLD BADWEL ROAD, GIDDALUR
TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI.
SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT, FOREST, SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS
HOFF, FOREST DEPARTMENT, ARANYA BHAVAN,
P.V.S.
LAND
MARK,
NEAR
APIIC
TOWERS,
MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, GUNTUR CIRCLE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.22111 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: “….to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authorities more particularly the Respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned Proceedings vide Rc.No.EFS02- 11031/16/2024-ADMIN SEC PCCF/Admn-3 dated 30.07.2025 by denying the Petitioner's request to cancel his earlier absorption order Ref. No.EFS02- 11031/16/2024-ADMIN SEC PCCF/Admn-3 dated 22.07.2024 and not reverting the Petitioner back to his original working place Guntur Circle Unit as highly illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Article 14, 16, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the impugned Proceedings vide Rc.No.EFS02-11031/16/2024-ADMIN SEC PCCF/Admn-3 dated 30.07.2025 issued by the Respondent No.2 and direct the Respondents to consider the Petitioner's request by reverting him back to his original working place Guntur Circle Unit in the post of Senior Assistant as there is a clear vacancy readily available….”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.
3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and on perusal of the record, without going into the merits of the case, the respondents are directed to consider the request made by the petitioner on 25.02.2025, if rule permits and to pass appropriate orders based on the record. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date: 15.04.2026 Ivd
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.22111 of 2025
Dated: 15.04.2026
Ivd