Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8357/2026 of G SUDHA RANI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 14 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 8357 OF Between: 1. G SUDHA RANI, W/O. V.JETHENDRA BABU, AGED 56 YEARS, WORKING AS CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER, TIRUPATHI ICDS PROJECT(RASS),
APHC010163092026
IN TH
WEDNESD
TWO
THE HON
WRI
Between:
1. G SUDHA RANI,
WORKING
AS
C
TIRUPATHI ICDS
WINDSOR APARTM
ROAD, TIRUPATI -
1. THE STATE OF AP
DEVELOPMENT
A.P.SECRETARIAT
DISTRICT-522503.
2. THE DIRECTOR, W
DEPARTMENT 4-
517501 ANDHRA P
3. THE
DISTRICT
EMPOWERMENT
517501 ANDHRA P
4. THE PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT A
ANDHRA PRADESH
5. THE RASHTRIYA
SECRETARY, DR
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
DAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APR
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
NOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
IT PETITION NO: 8357 OF 2026
W/O. V.JETHENDRA BABU, AGE
CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
PROJEC
PROJECT(RASS), R/O.FLAT
MENTS, 0PP. S.V.POOR HOME, K
- 517507, ANDHRA PRADESH
AND
P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRET
AND
CHILD
WELFARE
D
T,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI,
WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHI
16-243 AND 244, JAMPANI TOWER
PRADESH
WOMEN
AND
CHILD
WEL
OFFICER, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT
PRADESH
DIRECTOR, DISTRICT WOMEN
AGENCY(DW AND CDA), TIRU
H
SEVA SAMITHIRASS, REP BY I
R.S.VENKATARATNAM, H.O. SE
DESH
[3208]
IL
H
D 56 YEARS,
CT
OFFICER,
NO.209, CPR
KARAKMABADI
...PETITIONER
TARY WOMEN
DEPARTMENT
GUNTUR
ILD WELFARE
RS, GUNTUR-
LFARE
AND
T, TIRUPATHI-
AND CHILD
UPATHI-517501
TS GENERAL
VA NILAYAM,
ANNAMAIAH MARG, TIRUPATHI -517502 ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in issuing the proceedings of Order of discontinuation of services (reliving orders) Dt.
06-03-2026 by reliving the petitioner from service on dt- 31-03-2026 without conducting any enquiry as envisaged and without giving him any opportunity of personal hearing as highly illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to continue the petitioner in service with ail consequential benefits by setting aside the proceedings of Order of discontinuation of services (reliving orders) Dt. 06-03- 2026 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings in Order of discontinuation of services (reliving orders) Dt. 06-03-2026 issued by the 5th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.YASWANTH GADE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE
2.GP FOR SERVICES II
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 8357 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “….to issue order or orders, direction or directions, Writ or Writs particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in issuing the proceedings of Order of discontinuation of services (reliving orders) dated 06.03.2026 by reliving the petitioner from service on dated 31.03.2026 without conducting any enquiry as envisaged and without giving him any opportunity of personal hearing as highly illegal, arbitrary, in violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent to continue the petitioner in service with ail consequential benefits by setting aside the proceedings of Order of discontinuation of services (reliving orders) Dt. 06-03- 2026 …”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that after filing of the Writ Petition, the Respondent Authorities considered the case of the Petitioner and continued him into service. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in the matter and requested this Court to close the same.
3. Recording the submissions made by learned counsel for the Petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH Date: 15.04.2026 KK