Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18685/2019 of Ganji Kanthamma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18685/2019 Between: 1. GANJI KANTHAMMA,, LATE RAJARATHNAM,AGED 50 YEARS,COOLIE,R/O

APHC010379972019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 18685/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. GANJI KANTHAMMA,, LATE RAJARATHNAM,AGED

YEARS,COOLIE,R/O D.NO.1- 69,ALLAPURAM VILLAGE,GASNNAVARAM MANDALA KRISHNA DISTRICT

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,REVENUE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI,AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT,MACHILIPATNAM,KRISHNA DISTRICT

3. THE TAHASILDAR, GANNAVARAMMANDALAM,KRSIHNA DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto direct the respondents 1 and 2 to issue cultivation pattas in the name of petitioner by considering the representations dated 22-10-2019 and 28-4-2008, 18-12-2008,to agriculture land in R.S.No. 100 to an extent of 60.0 cents in allapuram village,Gannavaram Mandalam. Krishna Dt. and by directing the 3rd respondent to stop conducting survey for allotment of house sites by restraing from dispossessing the petitioner in any means and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019

JS, J W.P.No.18685/2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass interim order by restraining the 3rd respondent from dispossessing the petitioner from the agricultural land in R.S No 100 to an extent of Ac0-60 cents to conduct survey for the proposed house sites pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SRINIVASULU P Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

JS, J W.P.No.18685/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending writ petition, the respondents have passed orders on representations made by the petitioner. In view of the same, no further orders are required and requested to close the writ petition.

In view of the submissions made, since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 15.04.2026 rsd

JS, J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 18685/2019

Date: 15.04.2026 rsd

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead