Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/367/2026 of Asan Basha Sirajdeen Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 14 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2026 In/and CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 367/2026 Between: 1. ASAN
APHC010177172026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2026
In/and
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 367/2026
Between:
1. ASAN BASHA SIRAJDEEN, S/O. SIRAJ,AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.
D.NO.G23,
VENKATESWARA
NAGAR,KANGIYAM
ROAD,
TIRUPPUR, TAMILNADU
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT
AMARAVATHI
2. MEHRAJ SHAREEF, W/O.MAROOF,AGED 33 YEARS, OCC
BUSINESS,D.NO.
10-15-52,
MAIN
ROAD,RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM - 533101
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toThe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case aggrieved by the Judgement, dt.5.2.2026 in Crl.A.No.310/2023 on the file of the Family Court-cum- IX Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rajamahendravaram confirming the Calendar & Judgement, dt.11.8.2023
in C.C.No.604/2017 on the file of the Court of the V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajamahendravaram pleased to permit the Petitioner herein to compromise with the Respondent No.1 herein in the present CrI.R.C. and pass pleased to record the compromise and allow the Revision preferred by the
Petitioner against the Judgment, dt.5.2.2026 in Crl.A.No.310/2023 on the file of Family Court-cum-IX Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rajamahendravaram and pass
pleased to suspend the operation of conviction and sentence passed in Judgment dated dt.5.2.2026 in Crl.A.No.310/2023 on the file of Family Court-cum-IX Additional District & Sessions Judge, Rajamahendravaram confirming the Calendar & Judgement, dt.11.8.2023 in C.C.No.604/201on the file of the Court of the V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, 4
Rajamahendravaram and enlarge the Petitioner / Accused on Bail, pending the disposal of the above CrI.R.C. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VARREY VENKATA NAGA VISHNU TEJA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. SURAGANI KRISHNA VAMSI
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the Petitioner/Appellant/Accused under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS, 2023”) aggrieved by the Judgment dated 05.02.2026 in Crl.A.No.310 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Family Court-cum-IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rajamahendravaram confirming the Calendar & Judgment dated 11.08.2023 in CC No.604 of 2017 on the file of the Court of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajamahendravaram.
2. IA.No.1 of 2026 is filed under Section 359(6) of BNS read with Section 482 of Cr.P.C. by the Petitioner/Accused seeking permission to compromise the matter with the unofficial respondent in connection with the above case details.
3. IA No.2 of 2026 is filed by the Petitioner/respondent No.2 requesting to record compromise and allow this Criminal Revision Case.
4. Petitioner/Accused & Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant in this Criminal Revision Case appeared before this Court and they are identified by their respective learned counsels appearing on their behalf. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
6. The facts of the case are that Respondent No.2/ Complainant filed a complaint against the Petitioner for the offence under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act as the accused failed to repay the amount of Rs.10,00,000/-which is borrowed her. Challenging the concurrent Judgments of the Trial Court, the Petitioner/Accused carried the matter in this Criminal Revision Case.
7. At this juncture, the parties filed compromise petitions as stated supra stating that the matter is compromised between them and also filed a Joint Memo, which reveals that at the intervention of elders, the parties decided to settle the issue amicably and respondent No.2 agreed to withdraw the present criminal revision case against Petitioner.
8. Respondent No.2 submitted that she has no disputes with the Petitioner and she has no objection to record compromise in this matter.
9. Considering the submissions, in the interests of justice, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2026 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the Proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused vide Judgment dated 05.02.2026 in Crl.A.No.310 of 2023 on the file of the Court of Family Court-cum- IX Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rajamahendravaram confirming the Calendar & Judgment dated 11.08.2023 in CC No.604 of 2017 on the file of the Court of V Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajamahendravaram are hereby set aside. The Petitioner is set at liberty.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 15.04.2025 Mjl/*
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Criminal Revision Case No. 367 of 2026
15.04.2026
Mjl /*