Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6522/2026 of Vimala Devi Maddirala Vs The Authorized Officer, on 14 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3575] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT WRIT PETITION NO: 6522/2026 Between: 1. VIMALA DEVI MADDIRALA, W/O. MADDIRALA KRISTAPHAR, AGE ABOUT 75-YRS, R/O. D.NO. 20-7-2, SANTHI NAGAR
APHC010079432026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3575]
WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 6522/2026
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. VIMALA DEVI MADDIRALA, W/O. MADDIRALA KRISTAPHAR, AGE ABOUT 75-YRS, R/O. D.NO. 20-7-2, SANTHI NAGAR KEDARESWARA PETA, GANDHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-520003.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, M/S. CENTRUM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, CORPORATE AND REGISTERED OFFICE 801, CENTRUM HOUSE, CST ROAD, VIDYANAGARI MARG, KALINA, SANTACRUZ (EAST), MUMBAI-400098.
2. THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER, M/S. CENTRUM HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, D. NO. 7, FLOOR, 3RD CROSS STREET, CITI TOWERS, KASTURIBAI NAGAR. ADYAR, CHENNAI-600020.
3. RESERVEBANKOFINDIA, REPBY ITS. THE GENERAL MANAGER, MAIN BUILDING, SHAHID BHAGAT SINGH ROAD, MUMBAI-400 001.
...RESPONDENT(S): CORAM: HON’BLE Mrs. JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Present: None for petitioner. ***
WP-6522-2026 -2-
LISA GILL,J.
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondents not to take coercive action against the petitioner’s property in the proceedings initiated by the respondents under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (in short “SARFAESI Act”). Petitioner claims to be legal representative of the principal borrower.
2. On the last date of hearing, following order was passed:
“In the interest of justice, adjourned to 15.04.2026.
In case, there is no representation on behalf of petitioner and arguments are not addressed on adjourned date, this Writ Petition may be dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.”
3. Today, again there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter any longer.
4. We are, thus, constrained to dismiss this writ petition in default and for non-prosecution.
5. Copy of this order be conveyed to the petitioner at the given address. No order as to cost. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly. (LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE Date:15.04.2026 Ksj