Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/14939/2019 of K.Subbamma, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 14 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 14939/2019 Between: 1. K.SUBBAMMA,, W/O CHINNASINGARAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, RIO
APHC010319522019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 14939/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. K.SUBBAMMA,, W/O CHINNASINGARAIAH, AGED 48 YEARS, RIO APPARAJUPETA VILLAGE, BADVEL MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.,
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. TAHSILDAR, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly Respondent No.2 in interfering and obstructing the agriculture activity on the subject land of Ac.1.50 in Sy.No.475 A/3 of Rajupalem village, Badvel mandal, YSR Kadapa district witlqut issuing any notice and without passing any order as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and high handed, mala fide and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 not to interfere and obstruct the agriculture activity under taken by the petitioner on the subject land of Ac.1.50 in Sy.No.475 A/3 of Rajupalem Badvel mandal, YSR Kadapa district and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 not to interfere and obstruct the agriculture activity under taken by the petitioner on the subject land of Ac.1.50 in Sy.No.475 A/3 of Rajupalem village, Badvel mandal, YSR Kadapa district, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition becomes infructuous.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 15.04.2026 rsd
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 14939/2019
Date: 15.04.2026 rsd