Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/659/2026 of SMT NIMMAGADDA LAKSHMI Vs VARRE KUMARA SWAMY on 9 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 659/2026 Between: 1. SMT NIMMAGADDA LAKSHMI, W/O.
APHC010104772026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 659/2026
Between:
1. SMT NIMMAGADDA LAKSHMI, W/O. SUBRAHMANYM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-19, CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. VARRE KUMARA SWAMY, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED
ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O.CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU
MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2.
2. VARRE GANESH KUMAR, S/O. KUMARA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 42
YEARS, R/O.CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above-named Petitioner/JDR
begs
to
present
this
Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition being aggrieved by the order passed by the order of Honble Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division)-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First ClassVijayawada E.A.No. 28/2026 in E.P.No.289/2024 in
I.A.No.1659/2022 in O.S.No.500/2022, Dt19.02.2026 grounds to be urgedat the time of hearing.
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P. No.289/2024 in I.A.No.
1659/2022 in O.S.No.500/2022 including the order under E.A.No.28/2026, dt:
19.02.2026 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division) Vijayawada pending disposal of the CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAVI KUMAR C
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. C SUBODH
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
There is no representation when the revision petition is called for hearing. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also absent.
2. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 10.04.2026 ARR
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 659/2026
Date: 10.04.2026
ARR