Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2570/2026 of G. SATYANARAYANA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 9 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2570/2026 Between: 1. G. SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE PADNABAM
APHC010167092026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2570/2026
Between:
1. G. SATYANARAYANA, S/O LATE PADNABAM AGE 65 YEARS, OCC- EX-CEO G. SIGADAM PAC SOCIETY VANDRANGI VILLAGE, PONDURU MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT -532168
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR
HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
AMARAVATHI, A.P
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, G. SIGADAM POIICE STATION
SRIKAKUIAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. CH S V SURAJ
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2570 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) by the Petitioner/Accused for granting of pre-arrest bail in complaint Rc.No.1814/2021-B1, dated 20.03.2026 by Divisional Cooperative Officer, Srikakulam for the allegation of the offences punishable under Sections 314, 316(1), 318(1) and 336(1) of BNS, 2023 and Section 79(f) of the APCS Act, 1964.
2. Heard Mr.Ch.S.V.Suraj, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are false, baseless, and concocted, and that the petitioner is in no way concerned with the allegations made therein. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated by the Assistant Registrar of the Society at the behest of the defacto complainant, with the sole intention of harassing and causing inconvenience to the petitioner. The learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of the police officials.
4. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that no crime has been registered against the petitioner as of today and prays for dismissal of the petition.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, this Court finds no merit in the petition, as no crime has been registered against the petitioner. Accordingly, the criminal petition is dismissed, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court at an appropriate time.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10.04.2026 S D P
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2570 OF 2026 10.04.2026
W S D P