Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/897/2026 of SHAIK ZAREENA Vs SHAIK YASIN BABA on 9 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3163] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 897/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK ZAREENA, W/O. SHAIK

APHC010057012026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 897/2026

Between:

1. SHAIK ZAREENA, W/O. SHAIK HAMEED, AGE 49 YEARS, OCC

HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D. NO. 10/1, DRDO RESIDENTIAL QUARTERS, LAB QAUARTERS, KANCHANBAGH POST, HYDERABAD - 500 058

T.G.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SHAIK YASIN BABA, S/O LATE SHAIK MASTAN AGE 52 YEARS, OCC PRIVATE SERVICE, R/O. H. NO. 39-2-2, PITCHAIAH STREET, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, A.P.

2. SHAIK NILOFAR AKHTAR SULTANA, W/O. LATE SHAIK. KISHORE

@ KHAJA MOHIUDDIN AGE 47 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.

NO. 39-2-2, PITCHAIAH STREE, Y.V.RAO HOSPITAL ROAD, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, A.P.

3. SHAIK AMEER, S/O. SHAIK KISHORE ALIAS SHAIK KHAJA

MOHIUDDIN (LATE), R/O. D. NO. 39-2-2, PITCHAIAH STREE, Y.V.RAO HOSPITAL ROAD, LABBIPET, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R.

DISTRICT. A.P.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to allow the Civil Revision Petition, by setting aside the orders dated 09.09.2025 passed in I.A. No. 777 of 2025 in O.S. No. 115 of

2021 on the file of the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to settled principles of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in O.S. No. 115 of 2021, including the Respondent No.3 as Defendant No.3 in the above said suit, pending disposal of the accompanying Civil Revision Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. SHAIK KARIMULLA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the revision petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY, J. Date: 10.04.2026 ARR

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 897/2026

Date: 10.04.2026

ARR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead