Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/261/2011 of Modepalli Venkateswarlu Vs Potturu Seetharamamma on 9 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2575] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 261/2011 Between: 1. MODEPALLI VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKATARATHNAM AGRICULTURIST
APHC010060182011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 261/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MODEPALLI VENKATESWARLU, S/O VENKATARATHNAM AGRICULTURIST CHEEPANAPI VILLAGE, KALUVOY MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. POTTURU SEETHARAMAMMA, W/O. LATE VENKATA RATHNAM CULTIVATION R/O. CHEEPINAPI VILLAGE CHEEPINAPI POST KALUVOY MANDAL
2. POTTURU CHANDRABABU, S/O. LATE VENKATARATHNAM R/O. CHEEPINAPI VILLAGE CHEEPINAPI POST KALUVOY MANDAL
3. POTTURU ASHOK, S/O. LATE VENKATARATHNAM R/O. CHEEPINAPI VILLAGE CHEEPINAPI POST KALUVOY MANDAL
4. POTTURU RAJAIAH, FATHER OF LATE VENKATARATHNAM R/O. CHEEPINAPI VILLAGE CHEEPINAPI POST KALUVOY MANDAL
5. POTTURU VENKATASUBBAMMA, M/O. LATE VENKATA RATHNAM R/O. CHEEPINAPI VILLAGE CHEEPINAPI POST KALUVOY MANDAL
6. ANDHRA PRAGATHI GRAMEENA BANK, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER KALUVOY NELLORE DISTRICT
7. TOBACCO SUPERINTENDENT, D.C.PALLI VILLAGE AND POST POTTISREERAMULU, NELLORE DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. M VENKATA NARAYANA
The Court made the following ORDER :
The contempt case has been filed alleging violation of order dated 30.10.2009 passed in C.R.P.No.5121 of 2009.
2. However, subsequently, the Civil Revision Petition itself was disposed of vide orders dated 07.07.2015, as such, nothing survives for adjudication.
3. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 10.04.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 261/2011 Dt: 10.04.2026 Dvs