Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/3577/2013 of PULUSU SEETHAMMA & 2 OTHERS Vs ILLURI VENKATA DURGA REDDY on 9 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3577 OF 2013 Between: 1. PULUSU SEETHAMMA & 2 OTHERS, W/o Narasa Reddy, R/o D.No.4-15- 78/2, 3rd Lane, Postal
APHC010628392013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3577 OF 2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PULUSU SEETHAMMA & 2 OTHERS, W/o Narasa Reddy, R/o D.No.4-15- 78/2, 3rd Lane, Postal Colony, Guntur.
2. Pulusu Ramana Reddy, S/o Narasa Reddy, R/o D.No.4-15-78/2, 3rd Lane, Postal Colony, Guntur.
3. Pulusu Naga Malleswari, W/o Ananda Kumar, R/o D.No.4-15-78/2, 3rd Lane, Postal Colony, Guntur. ...Petitioners AND
1. ILLURI VENKATA DURGA REDDY, S/o Mallikarjuna Reddy, R/o D.No.11- 146/10, Sainadha Colony, Guntur. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioners: J VENKATESWARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent LAKKADI DAYAKER REDDY
The Court made the following ORDER :
The Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 08.07.2013 passed in I.A.No.1134 of 2013 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 309 days delay in preferring the CMA against the order dated 18.04.2012 passed in I.A.No.541 and 542 of 2012 in O.S.No.237 of 2012, whereby the said I.A.No.1134 of 2013 was dismissed.
2. As per the eCourt status, the suit in O.S.No.237 of 2012 was closed in view of the compromise entered between the parties, as such, nothing survives for adjudication.
3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 10.04.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3577 OF 2013 Dt: 10.04.2026 Dvs