Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/517/2026 of Akula Satyanarayana, Vs D.Durga Maheswararao on 9 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 517/2026 Between: 1. AKULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. PADMARAJU, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC

APHC010066102026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 517/2026

Between:

1. AKULA SATYANARAYANA, S/O. PADMARAJU, AGE 45 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO. 1-77, PATTENAPALEM (V), JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M) ELUM DISTRICT.

2. AKULA SRINIVASARAO,, S/O. PADMARAJU, AGE 48 YEARS, OCC

CULTIVATION,

R/O.

D.NO.

2-77,

PATTENAPALEM

(V),

JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M)ELURU DISTRICT.

3. AKULA CHELLARAO, S/O. PADMARAJU, AGE 50 YEARS, OCC

CULTIVATION,

R/O.

D.NO.

2-77,

PATTENAPALEM

(V),

JANGAREDDY GUDEM (M)ELURU DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

D DURGA MAHESWARARAO, STATION HOUSE OFFICER/SUB

INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BUTTAYAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU

DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. A JAYANTHI

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The instant petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed the Petitioner praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.783 of 2026 dated 08.01.2026.

2. Heard Sri P.V.S.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the Petitioners and Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the order dated 08.01.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.No.783 of 2026 has been complied with, the presentation of the Petitioners was considered, a case in Crime No.29 of 2026 has been registered by Buttaigudem Police, Eluru. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the contempt proceedings may be closed.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the case may be closed.

5. Considering the submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.04.2026 Dinesh

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

C.C.No.517 of 2026

Dt.10.04.2026

Dinesh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead