Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/658/2019 of SYED SUBHANI Vs SYED SUFIYA ALISA SHA BEGUM on 9 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 658/2019 Between: SYED SUBHANI, OCC RETIRED ASSISTANT MANAGER, STATE

APHC010176782019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 658/2019

Between:

SYED SUBHANI, OCC RETIRED ASSISTANT MANAGER, STATE BANK

OF HYDERABAD, R/O. D.NO 5-59-62, COBALDPET, 4TH LINE, GUNTUR.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SYED SUFIYA ALISA SHA BEGUM, HOUSE WIFE. R/O. D.NO 26-19- 141, MASEED STREET, KANKARAGUNTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR,

HIGH

COURT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT

AMARAVATHI

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. ARRABOLU SAI NAVEEN

2. SHAFATH AHMED KHAN

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

2. ANAND KUMAR KOCHIRI

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The instant Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C has been filed by the Petitioner / husband seeking to set aside the Order dated 09.04.2019 passed in Crl.M.P.No.66 of 2017 in F.C.O.P.No.45 of 2012 on the file of Family Court-cum- XII Additional District Court, Guntur.

2. Since there was no representation of both parties, this Court appointed Sri A.Sai Naveen, learned counsel as Legal Aid Counsel for Petitioner and Sri Anand Kumar Kochiri, learned counsel as Legal Aid Counsel for Respondent No.1. It is represented that the Petitioner is no more. The report submitted by the Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Tenali would also show that the Petitioner herein died on 28.08.2020 during Covid and the Respondent No.1 / Wife has been getting pension since his death. Both the Legal Aid Counsel would submit that the cause of action does not survive and the petition may be closed.

3. In that view, the Criminal Revision Case is closed.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Date:10.04.2026 Dinesh

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Crl.R.C.No.658 of 2019

Dt.10.04.2026

Dinesh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead