Andhra Pradesh High Court
TRCMP/95/2024 of PALIKA SRINIVASARAO Vs PALIKA VENKATE SAI LAKSHMI on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI TRANS. CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: Between: 1. PALIKA SRINIVASARAO, S/O LATE TATABBAI, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.45-48-2, AMBEDHKAR NAGAR, TADITHOTA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,
APHC010163152024
IN TH
THURS
TWO
THE HONOURA
TRANS.
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PALIKA SRINIVASA R/O.D.NO.45-48-2, RAJAMAHENDRAV JUDGE COURT, JU
2. MEESALA SUGUN HOUSE WIFE, MMAPETA, RAJAM JURISDICTION. RA
1. PALIKA VENKATE YEARS, STUDEN APARTMENT, G.V RAJAMAHENDRAV
2. PALIKA RAJYA LA HOUSE WIFE, D. RAJAMAHENDRAV
3. SMT ALTHI KRIS HOUSE WIFE, D.N BOMMURU, RAJAM
4. SOMAPUDI SATIS BUSINESS, D. NO PURIFIED WATER WATER SERVIEI EAST
RAI E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL CIVIL MISC.PETITION NO: 95/2024 ARAO, S/O LATE TATABBAI, AGE AMBEDHKAR NAGAR, VARAM, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM J URISDICTION. A, W/O LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGE D.NO.44-14-22, THOTAVEEDHI MAHENDRAVARAM JUNIOR CIVIL JU AJAMAHENDRAVARAM, ...P AND SAI LAKSHMI, D/O LATE KRISH NT, D.NO. 104-9-177, BF-2, SA V.NAGAR, AAVARAOD, RAJAMAHE VA RAM JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE JURIS AKSHMI, W/O SRINIVASARAO, AGE NO.45-48-2, AMBEDHKAR NAGAR VARAM, EAST GODAVARI. SHNAVENI, W/O PYDIRAJU, AGE O. 102-6-116, RAGHAVENDRA NAG MAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVA H KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGE O.41-13-01, PROPRIETOR OF SRI V R, AND PROPRIETOROF SRI V NG, AVA ROAD, NEAR ADITYA I LWAY STATION AREA, DESH
LAPATI ED 45 YEARS, TADITHOTA, JUNIOR CIVIL ED 36 YEARS, ANNAPOOMA UDGE COURT, PETITIONER(S) NA, AGED 21 AL NILAYAM ENDRAVARAM, SDICTION. ED 40 YEARS, R, TADITHOTA, ED'39 YEARS, GAR COLONY, ARI. ED 30 YEARS, VENKATA SAI VENKATA SAL NN BOTIQUE, HUKUMPETA,
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
5. ELLURI VENKATA MANIKAYALARAO MANI, S/O NOT KNOWN. PROPRIETOR SRI MATHA TINKERING, AGED
YEARS, BUSINESS, D.NO.41-13-01, AVA ROAD, NEAR ADITYA INN BOTIQUE, EAST RAILWAY STATION AREA, HUKUMPETA, RAJAMAHEN DRAVARAM. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. LACHIREDDI SRINU, , S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED 3 YEARS, BUSINESS,
0. NO.41-13-01, PROPRIETORSAI SRINIVASA A1 GARAGE, AVA ROAD, NEAR ADITYA INN BOTIQUE, EAST RAILWAY STATION AREA, HUKUMPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
7. MEESALA LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/O DURGARAO, AGED 41 YEARS, BUSINESS) FORETOR SRI SIDDHI VINAYAKA MOTOR WORKS, D.NO.41-13-01, AVA ROAD, NEAR AYA INN BOTIQUE, EAST RAILWAY STATION AREA, HUKUMPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition Under Section 24 of the C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to withdraw and Transfer the suit viz. O.S No. 27 of 2020 on the file of the Honble III Additional district judge at Kakinada to any of the District court at Rajamahendravaram and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in O.S No. 27 of 2020 on the file of the Hon'ble III Additional district judge at Kakinada and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G SUDHEER KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. HARI KRISHNA TATA
2. M S R SASHI BHUSHAN
The Court made the following order:
No representation for the petitioners.
Sri Hari Krishna Thata, learned counsel for respondent No.1/plaintiff and Sri M.S.R.Sashi Bhushan, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submit that the present Transfer Miscellaneous Petition has been filed before this Court, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking withdrawal and transfer of the suit viz., O.S.No.27 of 2020 from the file of the Court of VI Additional District Judge at Kakinada to any of the District Courts at Rajamahendravaram. They further submit that respondent No.1/plaintiff filed Transfer Original Petition No.73 of 2023 before the Principal District Judge, Rajahamendravaram and the said petition has been allowed. By virtue of the same having been allowed, the present Transfer Miscellaneous Petition has become infrucutous.
Recording the said submission, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ____ Date: 09.04.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
TRCMP No.95 of 2024 Date: 09.04.2026
MP