Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13925/2019 of Y HEMAVATHI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13925/2019 Between: 1. Y HEMAVATHI, W/O Y.MURALI , AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
APHC010302112019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13925/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Y HEMAVATHI, W/O Y.MURALI , AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC.AGRICULTURE, R/O/GANGAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY IT'S PRINCIPLE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE (ASSIGNMENTS-V) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUBCOLLECTOR, MADANAPAILI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHASILDAR, GANGAVARAM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in dispossessing the petitioner from the physical possession and enjoyment over the land in Sy.No.302/1 and 302/2 to an extant of AC.3.20 cents situated in Gangavaram Village and Mandal though his representation dt 28-11-2018 for relaxing the Ban and assigning the subject land on market value is pending with the 1st respondent as illegal, improper, unjust , arbitrary and further direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to dispossess the petitioner from the possession and enjoyment over the lands in Sy.No.302/1 and 302/2 to an extant of AC.3.20 cents situated in Gangavaram Village and Mandal till the orders are passed by the 1st respondent on the representation dt 28-11-2018 for relaxing the ban and assigning the land on payment of market value to the petitioner who is in possession and enjoyment said land since long time and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 not to dispossess the petitioner from the land in Sy .No.302/1 and 302/2 to an extant of Ac.3.20 cents of Gangavaram village and Mandal till the orders are passed by the 1st respondent on the Representation dt;28-11-2018 for relaxing the Ban and assigning the land in Sy.No.302/1 and 302/2 of Gangavaram Village on payment of market value pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMINENI SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter is called, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 09.04.2026
RSD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 13925/2019
Dated: 09.04.2026 RSD