Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1418/2026 of SHAIK IBRAHIM Vs SRI KUMAR VISHWAJEET on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1418/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK IBRAHIM, S/O. HUSSAIN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
APHC010133812026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1418/2026
Between:
1. SHAIK IBRAHIM, S/O. HUSSAIN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O.
VENIGANDLA VILLAGE, PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI KUMAR VISHWAJEET, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI -522237.
2. SRI B KRISHNA RAO, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT-
522601.
3. SRI M HANUMANTHA RAO, THE DEPUTY,SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARASARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT. - 522601.
4. SRI PRAKASH RAO, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET 1 TOWN
POLICE STATION, NEAR PEDDA CHERUVU, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU
DISTRICT. -522601.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents 1 to 4 for wilful disobedience and violation of the orders dated 19.11.2025, passed by this Hon’ble Court in WP No.32036
of2025 and pass such other order or orders as the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of Justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PADALA VENKATA SRIRAM REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, by the Petitioner, against the respondents for violation of the Order passed by this Court on 19.11.2025 in WP No.32036 of 2025. Heard Sri P.V.Sri Ram Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner, who appeared in video conferencing and Smt. A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for Respondents. Perused the material on record. At the time of hearing, learned Government Pleader submitted the written instructions of the Sub Inspector of Police, II Town Police Station, Narasaraopet, and would submit that by the date of passing the order by this Court in WP No.32036 of 2025 on 19.11.2025, the matter is investigated and the case is referred as ‘FALSE’. Thereafter, the Investigating Officer tried to serve notice on the Petitioner, but he refused to take notice. Hence, the Police filed refer charge sheet before the Court of I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Narasaraopet on 11.03.2026 vide CFR No.1182 of 2026. Learned Government Pleader would submit that the order of this Court is complied with by the respondents and hence, no further orders are necessary in this contempt case. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 09.04.2026
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Contempt Case No. 1418 of 2026
09.04.2026
Mjl /*