Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/254/2019 of DR. GAJULAPALLE RAJASEKHAR Vs SOFIA BI on 8 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 254/2019

APHC010158162019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 254/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. DR. GAJULAPALLE RAJASEKHAR, S/O.G.VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 43 YEARS, HINDU, DOCTOR, R/O.H.NO.46/1-SRN-201, A- CAMP, CHANIKYAPURI COLONY, KURNOOL.

2. B.SUBBA RAO, , S/O.LATE B.NAGALINGAM, AGED 71 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O.H.N.87 1087-42-2, GANESH NAGAR-2, KURNOOL CITY,

3. DR.B.SURESH, , S/O.B.SUBBA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.87/1087/42-2, GANESH NAGAR-2, KURNOOL CITY.

4. G.ASHOK REDDY, S/O.G.RAMF REDDY, AGED 46 YEARS, HINDU, R/O.8-9-53, 54/502-1, SRI DATTA NAGAR, OPP BDL, KARMANGHAT, SAROORNAGAR, R.R.DISTRICT.

5. G.ANASUYAMMA, W/O.G.RAMI REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, HINDU, R/O.8-9-53, 54/502-1, SRI DATTA NAGAR, OPP BDL, KARMANGHAT, SAROORNAGAR, R.R.DISTRICT.

6. DR.S.JAGADEESWARA REDDY,, S/O.S.NARAYANA REDDY, AGED 39 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT H.NO.46/1-B-D, FLAT NO.397, BRUNDAVAN PRIDE, KURNOOL CITY.

7. DR.P.DIVYA, S/O DR.S.JAGADEESWARA REDDY, AGED 31 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT H.NO.46/1-B-D, FLAT NO.307, BRUNDAVAN PRIDE, KURNOOL CITY.

8. A.SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O.LATE A.RANGA REDDY, AGED 48 YEARS, BUSINESS, HINDU, RESIDING AT H.NO.46/1-B-D, FLAT NO.309, BRUNDAVAN PRIDE, KURNOOL CITY.

9. A.BHARATHI, W/O.A.SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED 48 YEARS, BUSINESS, HINDU, RESIDING AT H.NO.46/1-B-D, FLAT NO.309, BRUNDAVAN PRIDE, KURNOOL CITY.

10. K.SAILAJA, W/O.M.SRINIVASA RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE, RESIDING AT H.NO.7/156-A FLAT NO.16, J.R. APARTMENTS, NGOS COLONY, CHINNA CHOWK, KADAPA TOWN

...APPELLANT(S) AND

1. SOFIA BI, S/O.S.AZMATHULLA, AGED 50 YEARS, MUSLIM, HOUSEWIFE, R/O.H.NO.81/59, KURNOOL DISTRICT

2. SALEHA BEGUM, W/O.KHALEEL RAHAMAN, AGED 33 YEARS, MUSLIM, HOUSEWIFE, R/O.H.NO.96/3-46-89, SANTOSHNAGAR, KURNOOL.

3. E MADHAVI, W/O.E.NAGANNA, AGED 32 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSE WIFE, R/O.H.NO.74/93-A1, MAHATMANAGAR, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

4. M RAJA REDDY, S/O.M.NARAYANA REDDY, HINDU, AGED 42 YEARS, COOLIES, R/O.H.NO.70-108-4A, KALLUR, KURNOOL

DISTRICT.

5. K ANJANEYULU, S/O.K.SAVARNNA, AGED 40 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.70-108-4, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

6. C P THIRUPALU, S/O.VENKATASWAMY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, R/O.H.NO.82/119, SHAREEN NAGAR, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

7. M DEVAMMA, W/O.LATE M.DANAMAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, HINDU, COOLIE, R/O.H.NO.74-106, MAHATMA NAGAR, KALLUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant(S):

1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M SIVA JYOTHI The Court made the following:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

C.M.A.No.254 of 2019 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Balaji Medamalli)

The plaintiffs’ have filed the present appeal against the order dated 29.01.2019 in I.A.No.246 of 2018 in O.S.No.68 of 2018 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge, Kurnool, refusing to grant temporary injunction.

2. Sri V.Dushyanth Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellants’ counsel, submits that the suit is coming up for arguments on 15.04.2026, and the appeal has been pending since 2019, it would be appropriate to direct the learned Trial Court to expedite the disposal of the suit.

3. Considering the above submissions, the C.M.A. is disposed of directing the learned Trial Court to expedite the disposal of the suit itself, uninfluenced by the findings recorded in the order passed

in I.A.No.246 of 2018 in O.S.No.68 of 2018. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 09.04.2026. Pab

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead