Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/625/2020 of M R ARUNAKUMARI Vs E GIRIDHAR BABU on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 625/2020 Between: 1. M R ARUNAKUMARI, M.R.ARUNAKUMARI W/O LATE RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT
APHC010210492020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 625/2020
Between:
1. M R ARUNAKUMARI, M.R.ARUNAKUMARI W/O LATE RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
2. M.KAVITHA, D/O LATE RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
3. M.R.JANAKIRAM, S/O LATE RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
4. M.R.JAGADEESH, S/O LATE RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, ALL ARE R/O 17-556, PANGAL, SRIKALAHASTI TOWN, CHITTOOR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. E GIRIDHAR BABU, .E.GIRIDHAR BABU S/O MUNIKRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 23-8-84/4B, PLOT NO.17, ROYALNAGAR, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
2. V DHARMA REDDY, S/O V.KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 44
YEARS,
R/O
GUNDELIGUNTA
VILLAGE,
AKURTHI
POST,
THOTTAMBEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents under the provisions of contempt of courts Act for willful violation of the orders of this Hon'ble court passed in
I.A.No. 2 of 2020 in WP No.12623 of 2020 dated 28-7-2020, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
Pleased to implead the proposed respondents 3 to 7 as respondents 3 to 7 in the above C.C.No. 625 of 2020, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. K NARSI REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. K MURALIDHAR REDDY
2. T LAKSHMI NARAYANA
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The instant contempt case is filed against the respondents for disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.2 of 2020 in W.P.No.12623 of 2020 dated 28.07.2020.
2. It is stated that the main writ petition itself was disposed of on 21.01.2021.
3. In view of the above, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 09.04.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:625 of 2020
Dated: 09.04.2026
ANI