Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/141/2025 of GOMPA NOOKARAJU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 141/2025 Between: 1. GOMPA NOOKARAJU, S/O. MANIKYAM, AGE. 38YRS,
APHC010057322025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 141/2025
Between:
1. GOMPA NOOKARAJU, S/O. MANIKYAM, AGE. 38YRS, RELIGION.
HINDU, R/O.D-NO.3-105. GAJJANAPUDI(V), PRATHIPADU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PREDESH AT
AMARAVATI.
2. GOMPA SUIYAMANI GINJALASUIYAMANI, W/O NOOKARAJU, AGE.
26YRS,
RELIGION.HINDU,
R/O.D-NO.2-264C,
BC
COLONY,
VAKALAPUDI, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased topleased to Set aside the order passed in In F.C.M.C.No.21/2020 On the file of the Honble Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate: Kakinada and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with filing of the original certified copy of Crl.M.C.No. 21of 2020 on date 10.01.2025 On the file of the Hon’ble Special Mobile Judicial 1st Class Magistrate Kakinada, before this Hon’ble Court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order dated 10-01-2025 in F.C.M.C.No.21/2020, On the file of the Hon’ble Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate: Kakinada and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BALA KRISHNA MANDAPATI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the Petitioner/Respondent under Sections 438 and 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short <BNSS, 2023=) seeking to set aside the Order dated 10.01.2025 passed in MC No.21 of 2020 on the file of the Court of the Special Mobile Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kakinada.
2. The facts of the case are that the Petitioner herein and the respondent No.2 herein are the legally wedded couple and due to disputes between them, they are living separately. Criminal cases, DVC etc., are pending between the parties. The wife also filed MC No.21 of 2020 seeking monthly maintenance against her husband, wherein by impugned order, the Trial Court granted monthly maintenance of Rs.15,000/- to the wife. Questioning the same, the present criminal revision case has been filed by the husband.
3. During the pendency of this case, the parties filed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) dated 15.03.2026 requesting to record compromise and dispose of this Criminal Revision Case.
4. Petitioner/Accused & Respondent No.2/Defacto Complainant in this Criminal Revision Case appeared before this Court and they are identified by their respective learned counsels appearing on their behalf. Copies of their Aadhar cards attested by their respective counsel are filed for proper identification.
5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor is in attendance.
6. As per the Memo of Understanding (MoU), the parties decided to settle the issue amicably at the intervention of elders and the Husband agreed to pay Rs.1.00 lakhs to the wife towards full and final settlement subject to withdraw of the cases filed by the wife against the husband and his family members.
7. The respondent No.2/Wife would submit that she has received Rs.10.00 lakhs from the Petitioner herein towards full and final settlement as per the terms of MoU. The parties expressed that they have no objection to record compromise in this matter.
8. Considering the submissions made, and in the interest of justice, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 09.04.2025 Mjl/*
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Criminal Revision Case No. 141 of 2025
09.04.2026
Mjl /*