Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/2538/2026 of Krishna Mallikonda Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 April 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2538/2026 Between: KRISHNA MALLIKONDA, S/O MALLIKONDA NARAYANA AGED 45

APHC010172112026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

KRISHNA MALLIKONDA, S/O MALLIKONDA NARAYANA

AGED 45

YEARS, R/O. TANAKANTIVARI PALLI VILLAGE

THAMBALLAPALLI

TALUK, MULAKALACHERUVU MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS

praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Mulakalacheruvu Police Station, Annamayya District to release the Petitioner/Accused on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr. No.

34/2026 of Mulakalacheruvu Police Station, Annamayya District and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1.D PURNACHANDRA REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.Purna Chandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, appears on behalf of the State and is in attendance.

4. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, since the offence alleged against the petitioner is Section 118(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the police shall follow the procedure prescribed under Section 35 (3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [Section 41-A Cr.P.C] and the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar1. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 09.04.2026 SAB 1 (2014) 8 SCC 273

Dt.09.04.2026 SAB

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead