Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/977/2026 of MENDU SRINIVAS Vs SRI DLV RAMESH BABU on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 977/2026 Between: 1. MENDU SRINIVAS, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC
APHC010090812026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 977/2026
Between:
1. MENDU SRINIVAS, S/O NARASIMHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC
CULTIVATION,
R/O
KESAVADASUPALEM
VILLAGE,
SAKHINETIPALLI MANDAL, DR. B.R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI
DLV
RAMESH
BABU,
THE
DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER,
ENDOWMENTS
DEPARTMENT,
KAKINADA,
KAKINADA
DISTRICT.533001
2. SRI M K T N V PRASAD, SRI PEDDINTLAMMA AMMAVARI TEMPLE, MENDUPALEM, KESAVADASUPALEM VILLAGE, SAKHINETIPALLI
MANDAL, DR. B.R AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT REP BY ITS
EXECUTIVE OFFICER 533252
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under Sections 10 to 12 of The Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation and disobedience of the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed interim orders in W.P No. 18980 of 2025
dated 24.07.2025 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V SASIDHAR
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
2. KAPPERA KOTESWARA RAO SC for Endowments, AP Region.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.18980 of 2025 has been complied with.
2. In view of the same, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 09.04.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
CONTEMPT CASE NO:977 of 2026
Dated: 09.04.2026
ANI