Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/33340/2018 of Pavela Subba Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 33226/2018 Between: 1. PENTAPATI LAKSHMANA SWAMY, S/O. LATE GANGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 68
APHC010689192018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 33226/2018
Between:
1. PENTAPATI LAKSHMANA SWAMY, S/O. LATE GANGA RAJU, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.D.NO.47-3-15,
5TH
LANE,
DWARAKANAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530016.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT (LAND ACQUISITION), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER CUM LAND ACQUISITION
OFFICER, POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT, RIGHT MAIN
CANAL, DIVISION-I, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, POLAVARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
5. SMT RAKURTHI VYJAYANTHIMALA, W/O. CHAKRADHARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.8-4-12, PLOT
NO.3,
DOCTORS
COLONY,
PEDA
WALTAIR,
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
JS, J
W.P.No.33226/2018
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in issuing Endorsement
L.Dis.No.E-1269748/2018/F
and
not
paying
compensation to the petitioner for the acquired land of Acs. 0.81 cents, Acs.
1.04 cents, Acs.0.93 cents, Acs.0.47 cents, Acs.0.57 cents and Acs. 1.18
cents in Sy.Nos. 346/4A, 350/1, 350/2, 358/8, 351/2E, 351/3E and 353/7 of Polavaram village and Mandal, West Godavari District, for being illegal, arbitrary, violative of provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act,2013
and unconstitutional, and consequently set aside the Endorsement . No.E- 1269748/2018/F of the 3rd respondent and direct the respondents 1 to 4 to pay compensation to the petitioner for the acquired lands of Acs. 0.81 cents, Acs. 1.04 cents, Acs.0.93 cents, Acs.0.47 cents, Acs.0.57 cents and Acs. 1.18
cents in Sy.Nos. 346/4A, 350/1, 350/2, 358/8, 351/2E, 351/3E and 353/7 of Polavaram village and Mandal, West Godavari District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to release compensation to the petitioner forthwith pertaining to the acquired lands of Acs. 0.81 cents, Acs. 1.04 cents, Acs.0.93 cents, Acs.0.47 cents, Acs.0.57 cents and Acs. 1.18 cents in Sy.Nos.
346/4A, 350/1, 350/2, 358/8, 351/2E, 351/3E and 353/7 of Polavaram village and Mandal, West Godavari District, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO BODDULURI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. RESU MAHENDER REDDY
JS, J
W.P.No.33226/2018
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the respondents have complied with the interim order passed by this Court on 30.10.2018 and therefore no further orders are required in the Writ Petition.
In view of the same, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 09.04.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 33226/2018
Date: 09.04.2026 rsd