Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2482/2026 of ISRAIL Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2482/2026 Between: 1. ISRAIL, S/O ALI MOHD, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O JAMALGARH
APHC010166632026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. ISRAIL, S/O ALI MOHD, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O JAMALGARH
VILLAGE, POST- JAMALGARH (156), MEWAT DIST. HARYANA.
2. ANISH,, S/O ASLUP, AGED 27 YEARS, R/O UTTAWAR VILLAGE, UTTAWAR-278, PALWAL, HARYANA.
3. SAJID,, S/O IKWAL, AGED 23 YEARS, R/O HOUSE 521, QURESHIYA MOHALLA UTTAWAR-278, PALWAL, HARYANA.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A. P., AMARAVATI.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2, 6, and 7 on bail in Crime No. 211/2025 of Tuni Town Police Station, East Godavari District, in the interest of justice, Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. PILLI SUNDEEP
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Pilli Sundeep, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 09.04.2026. UPS
Dt: 09.04.2026
UPS