Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/709/2011 of V.D.M.L.KALYANI,VSP Vs SRI VENKATESWARA VIDYA PEETH,REP.BY SCY,& 6 OTRS on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3575] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NOs: 709/2011 & 157/2012 Between: (1) V.D.M.L. Kalyani. ...Appellant Vs. Sri Venkateswara Vidya Peeth(Regd) ...Respondent(s) (2) Sri
APHC010060622011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
WRIT APPEAL NOs: 709/2011 & 157/2012
Between:
V.D.M.L. Kalyani.
...Appellant
Vs.
Sri Venkateswara Vidya Peeth(Regd)
...Respondent(s)
Sri Venkateswara Vidya Peeth(Regd),
...Appellant
Vs.
V.D.M.L. Kalyani
...Respondent(s)
CORAM:- HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
Present:-
Mr. Ravi Kondaveti, Senior Advocate
for appellant.
None for respondents.
******
LISA GILL,J.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for appellant/writ petitioner in W.A.No.709 of 2011 and respondent in W.A.No.157 of 2017 submits that both these appeals, one by writ petitioner and other by respondent, arise on account of a transfer order passed by management. Said appeals are, in fact, rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
2. None has appeared on behalf of Management, despite various opportunities and despite W.A.No.157 of 2012 being listed under the caption for dismissal on last two occasions.
3. Keeping in view specific submission on behalf of appellant/writ petitioner and perusing order dated 02.08.2011, whereby it has been held that writ petitioner is liable to be transferred as per the requirement of management, though, she would be entitled to the pay scale attached to the post, both these appeals are disposed of as infructuous. Liberty is afforded to unrepresented side to file appropriate application in case any incorrect fact has been placed before us. No order as to costs.
4. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of accordingly.
5. Photocopy of order be placed on the file of above mentioned connected case.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE
Date: 09.04.2026 ANS
HON’BLE MRS JUSTICE LISA GILL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT APPEAL NOs: 709/2011 & 157/2012 Date: 09.04.2026. ANS