Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16386/2025 of SYED RABBANI Vs UNION OF INDIA on 8 April 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 16386/2025 Between: 1. SYED RABBANI, S/O SYED BAJI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC ASSISTANT
APHC010324032025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 16386/2025
Between:
1. SYED RABBANI, S/O SYED BAJI, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC ASSISTANT PROFESSOR / RESEARCH, PERMANENT
RESIDENT OF D.NO.6-84, MANOJ MANSION, BANDUMALLI
ROAD, MUDINEPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF
ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. INDIA.
2. SYED ASAD UMAR RABBANI, S/O. SYED RABBANI AGED
ABOUT 12 YEARS, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER /
NATURAL GUARDIAN SYED RABBANI, S/O SYED BAJI AGED
ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC STUDENT, PERMANENT RESIDENT
OF D.NO.6-84, MANOJ MANSION, BANDUMALLI ROAD, MUDINEPALLI,KRISHNA DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA
PRADESH, INDIA.
3. SYED AYESHA NISA RABBANI, D/O. SYED RABBANI AGED
ABOUT 10 YEARS, MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HER FATHER /
NATURAL GUARDIAN SYED RABBANI, S/O SYED BAJI, AGED
ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC STUDENT, PERMANENT RESIDENT
OF D.NO.6-84, MANOJ MANSION, BANDUMALLI ROAD, MUDINEPALLI,KRISHNA
DISTRICT,
STATE-OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH, INDIA.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI -110011.
2. AMBASSADOR OF INDIA, EMBASSY OF INDIA, BADIYA, RIYADH, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA.
3. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER, . MINISTRY OF
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, PASSPORT OFFICE, D.NO.8-2-215 TO
219, KUMMARGUDA, SECUNDERABAD, PIN-500003 STATE OF
TELANGANA, INDIA.
4. THE REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICE RPO FOR ANDHRA
PRADESH, NEAR P.F. OFFICE, BESIDE RYTHU BAZAR, MARRIPALEMVUDA LAYOUT, NAD POST, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH - 530 009, INDIA.
5. AYESHA MATEEN, W/O SYED RABBANI, D/O MOHD. HABEEB
UR RAHMAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS. PERMANENT
RESIDENT
OF
D.NO.
12-2-396/56,
SHAHEED
NAGAR,
ASIFNAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA - 500028, INDIA.
PRESENTLY RESIDING AT ROOM NO.5, BUILDING NO.43, SALIM BIN MOAGAL STREET, AL NAKHEEL DISTRICT, RIYADH, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith issue Emergency Certificates / Temporary Travel Documents /
Temporary Passports in favour of the minor children - Petitioner No.2
Syed Asad Umar Rabbani (Indian Passport No. X6103882) and Petitioner No.3 Syed Ayesha Nisa Rabbani (Indian Passport No.
I0277250) to enable their travel from Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to India to attend the proceedings in G.W.O.P.No.47 of 2024 pending before the Honble XI Additional District Judge, Krishna at Gudivada, State of Andhra Pradesh, India, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 and 2 herein, to initiate steps for facilitating issuance of temporary travel documents / Temporary and allow the children / petitioners 2 and 3, to travel with the 1STpetitioner under the Court’s protective orders, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. ASHOK KONDETI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.16386 of 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER: -
Sri Ashok Kondeti, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ petition has become infructuous in view of the subsequent developments happened during the pendency of the writ petition and accordingly sought to dismiss the writ petition as infructuous.
2. In view of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Date : 09.04.2026 PGR
W.P.No.16386 of 2025
Date: 09.04.2026
PGR